Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 F.2d 294 - United States v. Dameron

United States v. Dameron’s Empirical Analysis

460 F.2d 294 · 1972

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
April 1994
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1994

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

140197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Pierson v. Ray · Lego v. Twomey · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville · United States v. Liles · United States v. Kilgen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statutory prohibition was triggered by his status as a convicted felon, a status which did not change until the pardon was received. The pardon simply came too late to save appellant from this charge. Compare United States v. Liles, 432 F.2d 18 (9th Cir. 1970).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)he subsequent pardon does not . . . free appellant from the legal consequences of his prior actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.