Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

460 F.2d 303

Docket No. 26835.

Scott v. Hocker

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-04-11

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1975

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-04-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

J. Rayner Kjeldsen, Esq. (argued), Reno, Nev., for appellant.

Herbert F. Ahlswede (argued) Dep. Atty. Gen., Robert List, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev.; Robert Rose, Dist. Atty., Reno, Nev., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The district court order denying Scott habeas corpus relief without a hearing is affirmed.

¶2

We find the "speedy trial" contentions do not rise to such proportions as to show a denial of constitutional right.

¶3

Also, we reject the contention that the final search of the car (the car had been previously under the control of Scott) was improper. We think that the search was perhaps an administrative search, proper as such and not too untimely. It also would appear that the last search (which was a re-search) was proper under the warrant issued a few days before.

/460/f2d/303 · .json · Public domain