Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 F.2d 477 - Juan Padilla v. Hon. Harold J. Ackerman

Juan Padilla v. Hon. Harold J. Ackerman’s Empirical Analysis

460 F.2d 477 · 1972

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
February 1998
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1998

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

60197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Johnson v. Avery · Samuels v. J Mackell Fernandez · McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 Cahokia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The State of California has by statute instituted an elaborate program for the medical treatment of defendants convicted of crime and who are “addicted or by reason of repeated use of narcotics may be in imminent danger of becoming addicted to narcotics____” Immediately upon the conviction of a defendant who appears to have a narcotics problem, the trial court is required to “adjourn the proceedings or suspend imposition or execution of the sentence and order the district attorney to file a petition for commitment of the defendant to the Director of Corrections for confinement in the narcotic detention, treatment and rehabilitation facility____””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.