Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 F.2d 545 - Winnick v. Manning

Winnick v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

460 F.2d 545 · 1972

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
4
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Gorman v. University of Rhode Island (1988), Simard v. Board of Education of the Town of Groton (1973)

28 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions

290197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc. v. United States · Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education · Frederick Wiseman v. Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he right to cross-examine witnesses generally has not been considered an essential requirement of due process in school disciplinary proceedings”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e are not inclined to hold that every deviation from a university’s regulations constitutes a deprivation of due process. Here the alleged deviations did not rise to constitutional proportions and did not constitute in themselves a denial of due process. Furthermore, the alleged deviations were minor ones and did not affect the fundamental fairness of the hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[plaintiff] had no constitutional right to review or appeal after the disciplinary hearing which satisfied the essential requirements of due process”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.