Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 F.3d 308 - Highland Capital Management LP v. Schneider

Highland Capital Management LP v. Schneider’s Empirical Analysis

460 F.3d 308 · 2006

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2024

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

80200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Salve Regina College v. Russell · VIGILANT INS v. Hous. Auth. · DiBella v. Hopkins · Riordan v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance · State of California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Shearman & Sterling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Based on this record, do the eight promissory notes issued by McNaughton Apparel Group, Inc., to the Schneiders fall within the definition of a ‘security’ as contemplated by Section 8-102(a)(15) of the New York Uniform Commercial Code?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must either . . . predict how the New York Court of Appeals would resolve the question, or . . . certify the [statutory interpretation] question to the New York Court of Appeals for a definitive resolution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Certification ... should be done 'sparingly, mindful that it is our job to predict how the New York Court of Appeals would decide the issues before us.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.