Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 F.3d 623 - United States v. Zheng Xiao Yi

United States v. Zheng Xiao Yi’s Empirical Analysis

460 F.3d 623 · 2006

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Crawford v. Washington · United States v. Beechum · United States v. Villegas · United States v. Paccione

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he lack of record evidence on pecuniary harm to the victim companies weighs against the district court's decision to use the infringed item value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is, or appears to a reasonably informed purchaser to be, identical or substantially equivalent to the infringed item”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a more accurate assessment of the pecuniary harm to the trademark owners.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.