Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

460 F. App'x 213

Thomas v. Bell

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 23, 2011

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2011-12-23

Decided 2011-12-23

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Titus Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying Thomas’ motion for a preliminary injunction in his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Bell, No. 1:08-cv-02156-AW (D.Md. July 26, 2011). We *214dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4 AFFIRMED.

/460/fappx/213 · .json · Public domain