Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 Md. 518 - Devincentz v. State

Devincentz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Abel · Arizona v. Manypenny · Dorsey v. State · United States v. Mandel · MacK v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'whether the trial court's error was unimportant in relation to everything else the jury considered in reaching its verdict.' " Devincentz v. State , 460 Md. 518 , 191 A.3d 373 (2018) (quoting Dionas , 436 Md. at 118 , 80 A.3d 1058 ). In cases in which "credibility is an issue and, thus, the jury's assessment of who is telling the truth is critical, an error affecting the jury's ability to assess a witness'[s] credibility is not harmless error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'whether the trial court's error was unimportant in relation to everything else the jury considered in reaching its verdict.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he outcome of [the] case turned entirely on the relative credibility of the defendant and the accuser,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.