People v. Hackett’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Silence, when the assertion of another person would naturally call for a dissent if it were untrue, may be equivalent to an assent to the assertion. This, however, fixes the party, by adoption, with the other person's assertion, and thus it ceases to be a question of conduct evidence, and involves a genuine admission in express words. " [ McReavy, supra at 213 , 462 N.W.2d 1 , quoting 2 Wigmore, Evidence (Chadbourn rev.), §292, pp. 229-230 (emphasis added).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Solmonson“McReavy further explained that Bigge precludes admissibility of a defendant's failure to say anything in the face of an accusation as an adoptive or tacit admission under MRE 801(d)(2)(B) unless the defendant `manifested his adoption or belief in its truth....' Id. We reiterated this understanding in People v. Hackett, 460 Mich. 202, 213 , 596 N.W.2d 107 (1999), in which we noted that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Redd“[a]lthough Bigge preceded the enactment of the Michigan Rules of Evidence, the rule of Bigge , like MRE 801(d)(2)(B), concerns tacit admissions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Redd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.