Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 NE2D 1011 - Walters v. Murat

Walters v. Murat’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1993
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Seavey v. Estate of Fanning · 167 Ind. App. 651 - Robison v. Fickle, Extr. · Rogers v. Rogers · 180 Ind. App. 429 - Moore v. Bowyer · Kuehl v. Terre Haute First National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “underlying assumption is that most persons who use joint accounts want the survivor or survivors to have all balances remaining at death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.