State v. Tuttle’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2021
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffith v. Kentucky · Boddie v. Connecticut · United States v. Satterfield · State v. Lack · State ex rel. D. G. W.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the policy of this [S]tate that restitution shall be made by each violator of the criminal laws to the victims of the violator's criminal activities to the extent the violator is reasonably able to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hauge“object[s] to the amount of restitution requested[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hauge“a hearing to determine the proper amount[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hauge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.