Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 Pa. 247 - Commonwealth v. Wright

Commonwealth v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
5
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably State v. Winegar (1985), Commonwealth v. Rose (1979)

3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

2301975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Davis v. Mississippi · Roberts v. Florida · Commonwealth v. Futch · Commonwealth v. Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We will not pass on this contention, for the issue has not been properly preserved for appellate review. Appellant’s suppression hearing took place one year after our decision in Commonwealth v. Futch, supra, but the claim of unnecessary delay was not raised until appellant filed his post-verdict motions. The court below was thus denied the opportunity to protect the trial proceedings from the alleged error. We have consistently held that failure to raise an issue below in a timely manner forecloses review at the appellate stage. Commonwealth v. Tucker, Pa., -A.2d - (1974); Commonwealth v. Segers, Pa., [ 460 Pa. 149 ,] 331 A.2d 462 (1974); Commonwealth v. Johnson, Pa., [ 457 Pa. 554 ,] 327 A.2d 632, 634-635 (1974); Commonwealth v. Blagman, Pa., 326 A.2d 296, 300 (1974) (concurring opinion of Roberts, J., speaking for a majority of the Court).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.