Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 Pa. 309 - Commonwealth v. Galloway

Commonwealth v. Galloway’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Lawrence Lines v. David Larkins Warden (2000), Doctor v. Walters (1996)

7 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

20019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Molinaro v. New Jersey · Smith v. United States · Selma and Meridian Railroad Company v. Louisiana National Bank of New Orleans · United States v. Swigart · 208 Pa. Super. 444 - Commonwealth v. Grillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the inherent discretion of any court to refuse to hear the claim of a litigant who, by escaping, has placed himself beyond the jurisdiction and control of the court, and hence, might not be responsive to the judgment of the court.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In order to give the trial court the first opportunity to rectify any errors that may have occurred in the trial process, and to aid in clarifying and framing the issues on appeal, we remand the record to the trial court for disposition of the post-trial motions on the merits. See Commonwealth v. Grillo, 208 Pa.Super. 444 , 449 n. 1, 222 A.2d 427 , 430 n. 1 (1966). Upon remand the trial court is directed to consider the issues raised in the “motions” filed January 17, 1973.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Additional and Supplemental Motions for a New Trial, Nunc Pro Tunc”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.