Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 SO2D 1087 - State v. Sutton

State v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 294 So. 2d 207 - State v. Snedecor · 291 So. 2d 771 - State v. Haynes · 443 So. 2d 531 - State v. Green · 344 So. 2d 973 - State v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every confession, admission or declaration sought to be used against anyone must be used in its entirety, so that the person to be affected thereby may have the benefit of any exculpation or explanation that the whole statement may afford.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.