Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 So. 2d 126 - Barnes v. State

460 So. 2d 126 - Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 557 So. 2d 542 - Griffin v. State (1990), 468 So. 2d 45 - Fuselier v. State (1985)

1 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

2301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · DeMarco v. United States · 428 So. 2d 576 - Gilliard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “relat[ing] to and cover[ing] all information regarding the client received by the attorney in his professional capacity and in the course of his representation of the client.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Upon request of defendant, the prosecution shall furnish to the court in camera any prior written statements of witnesses. If these materials are found to be materially inconsistent with the witness' testimony, the statement shall be supplied to defense counsel prior to cross-examination.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A very wide discretion must be afforded trial judges in deciding when to permit a defendant to examine the statement of a prosecution witness. . . . Two tests are important in determining whether the accused should have been given a copy of the statement: (1) did the statement contain information favorable to the accused not revealed in the trial? and (2) was the statement substantially the same as the testimony of the witness?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.