Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 So. 2d 1267 - Fraley v. Brown

460 So. 2d 1267 - Fraley v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2005

4 state decisions

20198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Achelis v. Musgrove · Perdue v. Roberts · Wiley v. Murphree · 360 So. 2d 306 - Jacoway v. Brittain · 384 So. 2d 7 - Carr v. Dunn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “parol evidence may be introduced to reveal a latent ambiguity in a writing which appears, on its face, to be clear and unambiguous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.