Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 SO2D 359 - Mikenas v. State

Mikenas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 564 So. 2d 1060 - Porter v. State (1990), Johnson v. State (2011)

40 state decisions

1801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Engle v. Isaac · Gissendanner v. State · Knight v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] plea of guilty must be voluntarily made by one competent to know the consequences of that plea and must not be induced by promises, threats or coercion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 536 So. 2d 226 - Lopez v. State · 997 So. 2d 375 - Tennis v. State
  2. “[t]he test set forth in [ Strickland ] does not `differ significantly' with the test espoused by this Court”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 708 So. 2d 656 - Goines v. State · 697 So. 2d 989 - Platt v. State
  3. “Before sentencing, Molina filed a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f), asserting that he did not understand the expectations of his substantial assistance agreement and that he was afraid he would not be able to provide assistance as law enforcement expected. During a hearing on Molina's motion, his attorney argued that Molina did not realize he would be expected to assist law enforcement from inside jail. The court denied Molina's motion after hearing only Molina's attorney's argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 942 So. 2d 1036 - Molina v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.