Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

460 So. 2d 367

460 So.2d 367

9 Fla.L.Weekly 513

Florida Bar v. Spriggs

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 6, 1984

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1984-12-06

Decided 1984-12-06

PER CURIAM.

¶1This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against Peter Kent Spriggs, a member of The Florida Bar is presently before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and report of referee. Pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.06(9)(b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, the referee’s report and record were duly filed with this Court. No petition for review pursuant to Integration Rule of The Florida Bar 11.09(1) has been filed.

¶2A stipulation of facts was entered into and filed before the referee by The Florida Bar and the respondent and the referee adopted the stipulation as the Finding of Fact in this cause.

¶3The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar and Disciplinary Rules 2-106(B) and 7-101(A)(3) of The Florida Bar’s Code of Professional Responsibility and that he receive a public reprimand for these violations.

¶4Having carefully reviewed the record, we approve the findings and recommendations of the referee. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

¶5Costs in the amount of $469.33 are hereby taxed against respondent.

¶6It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
/460/so2d/367 · .json · Public domain