Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 SO2D 396 - Mincey v. State

Mincey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited

29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 408 So. 2d 1091 - Leonard v. Leonard · Smith v. State · Swain v. State · State v. Green · 458 So. 2d 10 - Mitchell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because imposition of any sentence within the statutory limit, whether or not the sentence exceeds the recommended range, is still a matter within the trial court's discretion. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(b)(6). Of course, that discretion is subject to the "clear and convincing" standard, but it does not follow that a defendant is therefore entitled to the full panoply of due process rights every time a trial court announces it intends to aggravate a sentence beyond the recommended range.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.