Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

460 So. 2d 520

460 So.2d 520

9 Fla.L.Weekly 2594

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-12-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1985

1 state decisions

Relies on 396 So. 2d 1107 - Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n · 459 So. 2d 460 - Shepard v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-12-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse the order denying the defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. In Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107, 1112 (Fla. 1981), the supreme court held:

In modifying probation or in revoking probation and sentencing the probationer, credit must be given for time spent incarcerated pursuant to a split sentence probation order.

¶2Contrary to the state’s contention, credit must be given on both counts for time served since the time being served was running concurrently on both counts. Cf. Shepard v. State, 459 So.2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) {pre-sentence jail time can be allocated to two or more concurrent sentences in any manner the trial court sees fit). Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to modify the sentences to reflect the appropriate credit for time served.

/460/so2d/520 · .json · Public domain