Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 S.W.2d 147 - Waffer v. State

Waffer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2017

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

10019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mendoza v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““.. . was then and there a person who had previously been convicted of burglary, a felony, to-wit, the said LEO BUR-BIN RICE was duly and legally convicted on the 8th day of May, A.D. 1961, in the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Harris County, Texas, in Cause No. 88430 of said offense of burglary, a felony, styled the State of Texas vs. LEO BURBIN RICE upon an indictment then and there legally pending against him in said court and which said court had jurisdiction of said offense, and said conviction was a final conviction for which said LEO BURBIN RICE served a term in the Texas penitentiary. “And after the judgement (sic) of conviction in said cause No. 88430 had become final, the said LEO BURBIN RICE on or about the 2nd day of May, A.D. 1963, in said County and State did then and there have in his possession, away from the premises upon which he then and there lived, a pistol.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The repeal of a law where the repealing statute substitutes no other penalty will exempt from punishment all persons who may have violated such repealed law, unless it be otherwise declared in the repealing statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Absent an allegation in the indictment and proof that the previous conviction involved an act of violence, this conviction cannot stand. The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.