Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 460 U.S. 752 - United States v. Rylander

United States v. Rylander’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

1,271
cited by 1,271 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
26
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

394 federal appellate · 89 district · 141 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,271 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. Feiock (1988), Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1986)

394 federal appellate · 89 district · 141 state decisions — followed in 26 states

437019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Rylander (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7602

Relies on Kastigar v. United States · Fisher v. United States · United States v. Powell · Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Turner v. United States

Cited together with Maggio v. Zeitz · Shillitani v. United States · United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Hoffman v. United States · Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. Feiock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,271 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the shield * * * which it was intended to be into a sword”
    33 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a contempt proceeding does not open to reconsideration the legal or factual basis of the order alleged to have been disobeyed and thus become a retrial of the original controversy.”
    25 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]here compliance is impossible, neither the moving party nor the court has any reason to proceed with the civil contempt action. It is settled, however, that in raising this defense, the defendant has a burden of production.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.