Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 A.2d 473 - Davis v. Abbuhl

Davis v. Abbuhl’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2015

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August · Bernice Williams v. Steuart Motor Company, a Corporation, and Ford Motor Company, a Corporation. Bernice Williams v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation, and Steuart Motor Company, a Corporation · May Department Stores Company, Inc. v. Devercelli · Wingfield v. Peoples Drug Store, Inc. · Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 68 provides an additional inducement to settle in those cases in which there is a strong probability that the plaintiff will obtain a judgment but the amount of recovery is uncertain. Because prevailing plaintiffs presumptively will obtain costs under Rule 54(d), Rule 68 imposes a special burden on the plaintiff to whom a formal settlement offer is made. If a plaintiff rejects a Rule 68 settlement offer, he will lose some of the benefits of victory if his recovery is less than the offer. Because costs are usually assessed against the losing party, liability for costs is a normal incident of defeat.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] party defending against a claim may serve upon the adverse party an offer to allow judgment to be taken against the defending party ... to the effect specified in the offer.... An offer not accepted shall be deemed withdrawn.... If the judgment finally obtained by the offeree is not more favorable than the offer, the offeree must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Each case in this area necessarily rises or falls on its own facts and the trial court in ruling on the question of whether or not a jury verdict is excessive must determine on the totality of facts before it whether it was the result of passion, prejudice, or mistake.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.