In Re Murrin’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 303 · 11 U.S.C. § 305 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1408 · 28 U.S.C. § 1412 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield · Hertz Corp. v. Friend · City of Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications, Inc. · State of Texas v. State of Florida · Margaret Williamson v. Katherine Osenton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“civil proceeding under title 11” within the district court’s jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (b); as such it is before a bankruptcy judge by reference from the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 157 (a) and Loe. R. Bankr.P. (D.Minn.) 1070-1. As a fundamental”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.