Daniel P. Murphy v. Hoyt C. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
461 F.2d 1006 · 1972
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 1986
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Schmerber v. State of California · Sedillo v. United States · Davis v. Mississippi · Vale v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Murphy was not under arrest at the time the challenged search was made, and our review of the record convinces us that there were no such exigent circumstances existing at the time of the search which would require that it immediately be conducted without the procurement of a warrant, assuming that such probable cause existed as might have justified the issuance of a warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.