Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 F.2d 1148 - United States v. Steele

United States v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis

461 F.2d 1148 · 1972

Citation profile

171
cited by 171 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
22
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

91 federal appellate · 10 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 171 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Wayte v. United States (1985), United States v. Berrios (1974)

91 federal appellate · 10 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 22 states

780197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 13 U.S.C. § 221 · 13 U.S.C. § 8 · 13 U.S.C. § 9

Relies on Bolling v. Sharpe · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Oyler v. Boles · Snowden v. Hughes · Cannon v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 171 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “selection was deliberately based on an unjustifiable standard, such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is applied and administered by public authority with an evil eye and an unequal hand, so as practically to make unjust and illegal discriminations between persons in similar circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a strong inference of discriminatory prosecution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.