Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

461 F.2d 1266

Docket No. 72-1631.

Clark v. Volpe

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-07-10

5 counsel of record

Relies on 342 F. Supp. 1324 - Clark v. Volpe · Ragland v. Mueller · Mims v. Yarborough

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-07-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Moore v. State (1976), Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Wag-Aero, Inc. (1984)

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

24019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Richard M. Troy, Jr., New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Kent Frizzell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U. S. Atty., John R. Schupp, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., George R. Hyde, Dirk D. Snel, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for Secretary of Transportation.

Norman L. Sisson, Robert J. Jones, Howard P. Elliott, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for Dept. of Highways of the State of La.

Ralph L. Kaskell, Jr., of Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, La., for Boh Bros. Construction Co., Inc., R. Emmett Kerrigan, Charles K. Reasonover, New Orleans, La., of counsel.

David S. Cressy, Deputy City Atty., New Orleans, La., for City of New Orleans.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GODBOLD and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This is a class action in which plaintiffs seek to enjoin the construction, already in progress when suit was filed, of Interstate Highway 610 through City Park in the City of New Orleans. Suit was filed February 24, 1972, and on March 21, 1972, after an evidentiary hearing confined to the issue of laches, the court dismissed the action by application of the doctrine of laches. Its reasons for judgment are set forth in 342 F.Supp. 1324.

¶2

The decision of the District Court must be, and is, affirmed. Ragland v. Mueller, 460 F.2d 1196 [5th Cir., 1972.]

/461/f2d/1266 · .json · Public domain