Oldroyd v. Kugler’s Empirical Analysis

461 F.2d 535 · 1972

Citation profile

cited by 14 later decisions

cited 1 times by the Supreme Court

August 1984

most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1253 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283 · 28 U.S.C. § 2284 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Dombrowski v. Pfister · West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Except as otherwise provided by law, any party may appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting or denying, after notice and hearing, an interlocutory or permanent injunction in any civil action, suit or proceeding required by any Act of Congress to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Southway Discount Center, Inc. v. City of Birmingham
“We construe the inconsistent language as being both a judgment on the merits and also a judgment that plaintiffs' cause was one not meant for a Three-Judge tribunal for the court concluded that no substantial federal question was raised and therefore the Three-Judge Court dissolved itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Wilson v. Edelman
“to review and to reverse the judgment of the Three-Judge Court that 'there is no substantial federal question' and that the plaintiffs are not entitled to declaratory relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Wilson v. Edelman

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.