Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 F. Supp. 613 - Bryant v. Thomas

461 F. Supp. 613 - Bryant v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2009

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

1301978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1981

Relies on Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc. · Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc. · Jones v. Fenton Ford, Inc. · 373 F. Supp. 791 - Delay v. Hearn Ford · 433 F. Supp. 889 - Kantorczyk v. New Stanton Auto Auction, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All that is required of a purchaser before recovery will be allowed is that a change in the odometer reading has occurred and that the seller has failed to disclose the change. An intent to defraud arises from the proof of the foregoing in the absence of an explanation of the odometer change.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “civil liability may be imposed where it is proved that a defendant’s statements were made recklessly or carelessly, without knowledge of their truth or falsity, or without reasonable grounds for belief in their truth, especially in a case where (1) the defendant was under a duty to have the knowledge in question, (2) a relation of trust or expert reliance existed, (3) a statement was made to induce a business arrangement, or (4) the knowledge or information in question was within the special province of the defendant. Such conditions being met, it does not matter whether or not the declarant actually believed the statement (or statements) in question to be true, [citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.