Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 Mass. 198 - Commonwealth v. Young

Commonwealth v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anchors v. United States · Commonwealth v. Wright · Commonwealth v. Cunneen · Commonwealth v. Azar · State v. Fair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An actor is justified in using force against another to protect a third person when (a) a reasonable person in the actor's position would believe his intervention to be necessary for the protection of the third person, and (b) in the circumstances as that reasonable person would believe them to be, the third person would be justified in using such force to protect himself.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[Fjactors which a jury can consider in deciding whether a murder was committed with extreme atrocity or cruelty . . . include [1] indifference to or taking pleasure in the victim’s suffering, [2] consciousness and degree of suffering of the victim, [3] extent of physical injuries, [4] number of blows, [5] manner and force with which delivered, [6] instrument employed, and [7] disproportion between the means needed to cause death and those employed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When reviewing jury instructions, '[w]e evaluate the instruction as a whole, looking for the interpretation a reasonable juror would place on the judge's words.' ... We do not consider bits and pieces of the instruction in isolation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.