People v. Bowles’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
December 2019
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the implementation of a decision to terminate life-support treatment is not the cause of the patient's subsequent death. Instead, the discontinuance of life-support measures merely allows the patient's injury or illness to take its natural and inevitable course.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Abella · State v. Pelham“no separate intervening cause. Rather, we find in these facts only the unsuccessful efforts of the medical community to overcome the harm inflicted by the defendant, and the acceptance by the victim's family of the reality of [the] fatal injuries.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Abella · State v. Pelham“the victim's death was caused by the intervening cause of removal from life support systems that were required to sustain the life of the victim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Abella · State v. Pelham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.