Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 So. 2d 1046 - State v. Lingle

461 So. 2d 1046 - State v. Lingle’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on Jencks v. United States · Wardius v. Oregon · State v. Toomer · State v. Migliore · State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Upon motion of the defendant, the court shall order the district attorney to permit or authorize the defendant to inspect and copy, photograph, or otherwise reproduce any results or reports, or copies thereof, of physical or mental examination, and of scientific tests or experiments made in connection with or material to the particular case, that are in the possession, custody, control, or knowledge of the district attorney and intended for use at trial. Exculpatory evidence shall be produced under this article even though it is not intended for use at trial.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “afford the defendant a chance to prepare adequately for trial and to eliminate unwarranted prejudice which could arise from surprise testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`if related to the witness' testimony at trial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.