Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 So. 2d 1099 - State v. Diaz

461 So. 2d 1099 - State v. Diaz’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1996
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Michigan v. Thomas · Florida v. Meyers · 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 359 So. 2d 931 - State v. Boyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... Because the scales were not calibrated, and because the marijuana was mixed with debris and contained stalks and seeds not classified as a controlled substance, it is apparent the amount possessed is dependent upon the credibility of the witnesses and the efficiency of the separation and weighing. This is obviously a jury question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “inherent in the officer's right to stop a suspect and demand his name, address, and an explanation of his actions is the right to detain him temporarily to verify the information given or available to the officers or to obtain information independently from his cooperation. State v. Fauria, 393 So.2d 688 (La. 1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.