Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 SO2D 1332 - Ex Parte Harris

Ex Parte Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2016

8 state decisions

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hepler v. Hepler · 44 N.J. Super. 305 - Morrone v. Morrone · Kreutzer v. Kreutzer · 33 Ill. App. 3d 327 - Crownover v. Crownover · 76 Cal. App. 2d 344 - Bole v. Bole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a trial court may not prohibit a witness from testifying in a divorce case solely because the proposed witness is a child of the parties even though calling children to testify against one of their parents in a divorce case is distasteful and should be discouraged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Testimony of competent children in a divorce action must be admitted, if relevant, otherwise admissible, and not merely cumulative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.