461 So. 2d 15 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Seals v. State · Aaron v. State · Carlisle v. State · Key v. State · 382 So. 2d 614 - Abercrombie v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The general rule is that evidence by a third party of an extrajudicial identification is admissible in rebuttal of testimony tending to impeach or discredit the identifying witness, or to rebut a charge, imputation or inference of falsity. . . ."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"We are of the opinion that the testimony of a third person who heard or observed an extrajudicial identification should not be admitted except under circumstances such as were present in Aaron v. State . . . or under unusual circumstances."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.