Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 So. 2d 277 - Dominguez v. State

461 So. 2d 277 - Dominguez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1993
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 383 So. 2d 219 - Eutsey v. State · Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure · 376 So. 2d 47 - Adams v. State · Brady v. State · Washington v. Mayo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not reclassify crimes as higher substantive crimes; it merely prescribes longer penalties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “necessary for the protection of the public from further criminal activity by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.