Burrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 406 So. 2d 439 - Ellison v. State · 420 So. 2d 826 - Stephens v. State · 429 So. 2d 636 - Burrell v. State · 435 So. 2d 230 - Whitson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order for a petitioner to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing, he must ‘make a full disclosure of the specific facts relied upon and not mere conclusions as to the nature and effect of such facts’ and provide affidavits which sufficiently refute a record that appears correct. [Citations omitted.] “We hold that the above requirements have been met in this case. The petitioner has set out supportive facts of his claim of inadequacy of counsel and signed an affidavit that the allegations contained in his petition are true. This affidavit is sufficient since the trial record is not before us. [Citation omitted.]” Id. at 42 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.