461 So. 2d 455 - State v. Kennedy’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1999
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 425 So. 2d 1251 - State v. Telsee · 414 So. 2d 666 - State v. Wimberly · 428 So. 2d 468 - State v. Guajardo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We now consider whether the trial court adequately complied with LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 894.1. Rather than articulate reasons for sentencing, the trial court made defendant’s presentence investigation a part of the record. “If where the trial court has failed to comply with LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 894.1 by providing some reasons for its maximum sentence, and there are facts in the record which would allow us to make an independent determination of whether this sentence is excessive, we may do so....””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sheppard“[w]hoever commits the crime of armed robbery shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than five years and for not more than ninety-nine years without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.