Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 SO2D 496 - State v. Freeman

State v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Dorsey · 407 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Rives · State v. McAllister · 298 So. 2d 814 - State v. Sears

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any irregularity in the arraignment, including a failure to read the indictment, is waived if the defendant pleads to the indictment without objecting thereto. A failure to arraign the defendant or the fact that he did not plead, is waived if the defendant enters upon the trial without objecting thereto, and it shall be considered as if he had pleaded not guilty.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is true that a defendant has a right to be arraigned. C.Cr.P. 551. However, where a defendant enters upon trial without objecting to the defect, he is deemed to have waived his right under C.Cr.P. Art. 555. Moreover, the defendant does not contend nor show that any prejudice resulted from the entering of the plea of not guilty. Cf. State v. Franks, 284 So.2d 584 (La. 1973).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.