Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 So. 2d 686 - Jones v. State

461 So. 2d 686 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

129
cited by 129 later decisions
3
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

123 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State (1987), 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State (1991)

123 state decisions

5901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Wong Sun v. United States · Edwards v. Arizona · Escobedo v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he State has the burden of proving all facts prerequisite to admissibility beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Lutes v. State · 525 So. 2d 385 - Kniep v. State
  2. “In the voir dire examination of jurors, the attorney shall direct to the entire venire questions only on matters not inquired into by the court. Individual jurors may be examined only when proper to inquire as to answers given or for other good cause allowed by the court... .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · 688 So. 2d 791 - Simon v. State
  3. “We recognize that thoroughness and intensity of review are heightened in cases where the death penalty has been imposed. [citation omitted] What may be harmless error in a case with less at stake becomes reversible error when the penalty is death.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Pinkton v. State · 525 So. 2d 365 - Cole v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.