Galvan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2005
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barber v. Page · Grice v. State · 163 Tex. Crim. 587 - McGowen v. State · Leal v. State · 167 Tex. Crim. 390 - Chapin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... The deposition of a witness ... taken at any prior trial of the defendant for the same offense, may be used by either the State or the defendant in the trial of such defendant’s criminal case under the following circumstances: “When oath is made by the party using the same that ... by reason of age or bodily infirmity, such witness cannot at- • tend. When the testimony is sought to be used by the State, the oath may be made by any credible person. When sought to be used by the defendant, the oath shall be made by him in person.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Porier v. State““Our investigation leads us to conclude that where the evidence, as here, shows the finger print found at the scene of the crime was left there by the criminal at the time the crime was committed, thereby excluding the hypothesis that it ■might have been placed there innocently prior to or subsequent to the commission of the crime, and the evidence further shows that said print is identical with known prints of accused, that such evidence satisfied the law and excludes every reasonable hypothesis save guilt of the accused.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hearn v. State““In his fourth ground of error, appellant complains of the trial court’s refusal to grant his first motion for continuance. Since the motion was not sworn to by the defendant himself, as required by Article 29.08, V.A.C.C.P., it is not before this Court for review. McGowen v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 587 , 290 S.W.2d 521 , cert, denied 352 U.S. 902 , 77 S.Ct. 268 , 1 L.Ed.2d 114 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.