Pierce v. Tharp’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2009
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte State Bar Ass'n · Memphis Street Railway Co. v. Byrne · Chumbley v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. · In re Cameron · 23 Tenn. App. 409 - Nelson v. Rural Educational Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In re Bowers, [ 137 Tenn. 193 , 192 S.W. 919 (Tenn.1917)], it is said: “Section 2 of article 6 of the state Constitution provides that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court ‘shall be appellate only * * *.'" “This section of the Constitution has been construed in many cases, and the holdings of this court have been uniform to the effect that it is without original jurisdiction in any matter, and that it is beyond the power of the Legislature to confer original jurisdiction upon it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peck v. Tanner“[P]etitioners preferred to rest on their oars until the Court announced its decision, and then come forward with a belated effort to charge that some of the justices on the Court were disqualified to hear the case. If any member of the Court were disqualified to participate in the hearing, such [issue] was waived by failure of petitioners ... to make objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.