Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 461 U.S. 571 - Cardwell v. Taylor

Cardwell v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2012 · most notably New Jersey v. T. L. O. (1985), Duckworth v. Eagan (1989)

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

5101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedTaylor v. Cardwell (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Stone v. Powell · Dunaway v. New York · Sumner v. Mata · Bullock v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the State has provided an opportunity for full and fair litigation of a Fourth Amendment claim, the Constitution does not require that a state prisoner be granted federal habeas corpus relief on the ground that evidence obtained in an unconstitutional search or seizure was introduced at his trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]f the statements were involuntary, and therefore obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment, . . . the federal courts [could] grant relief on collateral review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.