Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 A2D 497 - State v. Mikulewicz

State v. Mikulewicz’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably State v. Coombs (1998), State v. Larrivee (1984)

34 state decisions

13019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Rochin v. People of California · Mincey v. Arizona · Olmstead v. United States · Lego v. Twomey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A confess:on is voluntary if it results from the free choice of a rational mind, if it is not i product of coercive police conduct, and if under all of the circumstances its admission would be fundamentally fair.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We would also note that the other circumstances of this interrogation only served to enhance its overall unfairness. The Defendant's age, his nakedness throughout the interrogation, the fact that he was lying in a bed and did not feel well, the length of the continuous interrogation, the number of officers involved, and the "tag-team” approach to questioning, when combined with the use of alcohol to encourage the Defendant to talk, comprise a sorry spectacle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “.[T]he voluntariness requirement gives effect to, three overlapping but conceptually distinct values: (1) it discourages objectionable, police practices; (2) it protects the mental freedom of the individual; and (3) it preserves a quality of fundamental fairness in the criminal justice system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.