Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 BR 844 - In re Pitts

In re Pitts’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · In Re Bowling · In Re Pendlebury · In Re Hovestadt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Case law construing § 524(c)... supports the conclusion that the requirements ... must be strictly complied with in order for a reaffirmation agreement to be enforceable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.