Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 F.2d 1053 - Hammond v. Powell

Hammond v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

462 F.2d 1053 · 1972

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Johnson v. American Credit Co. of Georgia (1978), 15 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1413, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7909 Ramsey Alexander and Robert F. Newman, Raymond L. Dennis and Warner McCreary Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Ramsey Alexander and Robert F. Newman, Raymond L. Dennis and Warner McCreary Plaintiffs-Intervenors v. Avco Corp., Aerospace Structures Division (1978)

10 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

200197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343

Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Lynch v. Household Finance Corp. · Lee v. Washington · Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “take judicial notice of the fact that frequently in our credit economy persons in appellant's situation are subjected to deprivation of their personal property under statutes like the one challenged. Thus, the public interest in having this suit considered is substantial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “due to her poverty, appellant will likely again be subject to the challenged statutory procedure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.