Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 F.2d 1354 - Broward Davis v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

Broward Davis v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections’s Empirical Analysis

462 F.2d 1354 · 1972

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2003 · most notably Marrow v. United States (1985), United States v. Espinoza (1973)

20 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2201972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · United States v. Tucker · Burgett v. Texas · Tucker v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We find no merit in the appellant’s contention concerning advice of the right to take a direct appeal. The rule with regard to federal defendants is that there is no necessity to advise them of the right to appeal after they have pled guilty. Such advice not being a right accorded to a .federal defendant, it is clear to us that failure to so advise may not be reached as a claimed violation of federal constitutional rights in federal habeas corpus proceedings by a state prisoner attacking a conviction based on a plea of guilty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.