Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

462 F.2d 488

Docket Nos. 71-2029, 71-2057.

Freeman W. Sailor v. United States of America, Louis R. Klotter v. United States

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Freeman W. SAILORv.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Louis R
  • KLOTTERv.UNITED STATES of America

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-04-25

2 counsel of record

Relies on 333 F. Supp. 158 - United States v. McClard · Sailor v. United States · United States v. McClard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-04-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 1995

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

60197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sixth Circuit.

¶1

William S. Heidenberg, Louisville, Ky., Raymond F. Bossmeyer, Heidenberg & Bossmeyer, Louisville, Ky., on brief, for appellants.

¶2

Bruce I. Kogan, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen. Meyer Rothwacks, John P. Burke, Attys., Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief, George J. Long, U. S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., of counsel, for appellee.

¶3

Before CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges, and RUBIN, District Judge.*

ORDER

¶4

In these actions plaintiffs-appellants seek to recover taxes paid by them on the ground of alleged unconstitutionality of the federal wagering tax provisions, 26 U.S.C. Secs. 4411 and 4401, under which such taxes were assessed. The Court being fully advised by the record on appeal, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel has concluded that the contentions of the plaintiffs-appellants are without merit, and accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed by District Judge Rhodes Bratcher,

¶5

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court, 343 F.Supp. 1279 be and it hereby is affirmed.

*

Honorable Carl B. Rubin, United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

/462/f2d/488 · .json · Public domain