Knapp v. McFarland’s Empirical Analysis
462 F.2d 935 · 1972
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Oates (1977), Peter Bartok v. Boosey & Hawkes, Inc., and Benjamin Suchoff, as Trustee of the Estate of Bela Bartok (1975)
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1962 · 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Relies on Guiseppi v. Walling · Hauser v. Bartow · Yazoo Co v. City of Clarksdale · Neifeld v. Steinberg · Dieffenbach v. . Roch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A transcript of the judgment of a court of the United States rendered or filed within the state may be filed in the office of the clerk of any county and upon such filing the clerk shall docket the judgment in the same manner and with the same effect as a judgment entered in the supreme court within the county.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]very judgment rendered by a district court within a State shall be a lien on the property located in such State in the same manner, to the same extent and under the same conditions as a judgment of general jurisdiction in such State”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any judgment, decree or order of a court of the United States or of any other court which is entitled to full faith and credit in”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.