Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 F.2d 992 - Leavitt v. Howard

Leavitt v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis

462 F.2d 992 · 1972

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
5
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 8 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably United States v. Cepulonis (1976), 640 So. 2d 22 - Kennedy v. State (1993)

35 federal appellate · 8 district · 9 state decisions

32019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · North Carolina v. Alford · Townsend v. Sain · Brown v. Allen · Bumper v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The application of that principle to consent to search is particularly apt. A defendant may believe that search is ultimately inevitable whether he consents or not. In such circumstances a suspect might well feel he is better off to consent than to oppose.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “. . . [T]he federal court is bound by the state court's finding of historical facts unless the petitioner offers convincing evidence that they are erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[blowing to events, even if one is not happy about them, is not the same thing as being coerced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.